Drawing for HOUSEWARMERS

USPTO serial 76014779

HOUSEWARMERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOUSEWARMERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew W. Barnes

MATTHEW W BARNES BERKOWITZ LEFKOVITS ISOM & KUSHNER1600 S TRUST TWR420 20TH ST NBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-5200

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others through the design distribution of advertising materials of othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2004PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jun 28, 2004PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 10, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 4, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
May 21, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 21, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 21, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 22, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 10, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 27, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 26, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance