USPTO serial 76014779
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Vaughan, Ontario, CA
Vaughan, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew W. Barnes
MATTHEW W BARNES BERKOWITZ LEFKOVITS ISOM & KUSHNER1600 S TRUST TWR420 20TH ST NBIRMINGHAM, AL 35203-5200| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the goods and services of others through the design distribution of advertising materials of others | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |