USPTO serial 76014803
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Pickering, Ontario, CA
Pickering, Ontario, CA
Pickering, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael D. Fishman
Nathan C. Belzer Belzer PC2905 Bull StreetSavannah, GA 31405UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MANAGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURES; NAMELY, SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM HELP DESK FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, TRACKING AND MANAGING USER SERVICE DISRUPTIONS, REQUESTS FOR SERVICE AND SERVICE RESTORATIONS DUE TO INFRASTRUCTURE OUTAGES; SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM CHANGE MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, TRACKING, APPROVING, MONITORING AND MANAGING SYSTEM CHANGES IMPLEMENTED WITHIN THE INFRASTRUCTURE; SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM PROBLEM MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, INITIATING AND TRACKING INVESTIGATIONS INTO COMPUTER PROBLEMS IN ORDER TO IDENTIFY ROOT CAUSES OF THE PROBLEMS, TRACKING AND BRINGING RESOLUTION TO KNOWN COMPUTER ERRORS, AND PROVIDING A KNOWLEDGE BASE CONSISTING OF SERVICE RESTORATIONS, REQUESTS FOR COMPUTER SERVICE, TEMPLATES AND SCRIPTS TO ASSIST IN COMPUTER SERVICE RESTORATIONS AND/OR REQUESTS FOR COMPUTER SERVICE; SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM ASSET/CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, MONITORING AND TRACKING INVENTORY OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES, DEFINING ATTRIBUTES OF AND RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SUCH HARDWARE, SOFTWARE, NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND PROCEDURES WITHIN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE, AND DETAILING THE CONTRACTUAL AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE; SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM SERVICE LEVEL MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, DOCUMENTING SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS, NAMELY, WRITTEN AGREEMENTS BETWEEN SERVICE PROVIDERS AND CUSTOMERS WHICH DOCUMENT AGREED SERVICE LEVELS AND TAKING APPROPRIATE ACTIONS TO MAINTAIN, JUSTIFY, MEASURE AND MONITOR SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENTS AND OPERATIONAL LEVEL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICE PROVIDERS AND USERS, AND BETWEEN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT GROUPS, AND; SOFTWARE USED TO PERFORM CONTACT MANAGEMENT FUNCTIONS, NAMELY, DEFINING AND TRACKING ORGANIZATION AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES, NAMELY, LOGICAL GROUPINGS OF PEOPLE BROKEN DOWN INTO DISCRETE OPERATIONAL GROUPS AND EMPLOYMENT POSITIONS TO ENABLE IDENTIFICATION OF BUSINESS OPERATIONAL AREAS, GEOGRAPHICAL SITES AND LOCATIONS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE AND PEOPLE, THEIR ATTRIBUTES, ASSOCIATIONS AND ROLES WITHIN THE ORGANIZATION AND WITHIN THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |