USPTO serial 76014829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
BLOOMFIELD, CO
Burlington, MA
BURLINGTON, MA
BURLINGTON, MA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia E. Johnson
ADAM LINDQUIST SCOVILLE FAEGRE & BENSON LLP1700 LINCOLN ST STE 3200WELLS FARGO CTRDENVER, CO 80203-4532| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers, modems, electronic switching devices, namely, virtual private network (VPN) units, firewall units, routers, channel service unit/data service unit (CSU-DSU) units, splitter boxes, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) boxes and computer software for providing access to a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing on-site repair and maintenance of electronic devices, namely, virtual private network (VPN) units, firewall units, routers, channel service unit/data service unit (CSU-DSU) units, splitter boxes, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) boxes, and of computer hardware used in providing access to a global computer network; installation of computer hardware for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Provision of telecommunications connections to a global computer network; providing fiber-optic communication services, namely, providing connections to a global computer information network for electronic transmission of data, images, documents and messages; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Electronic storage of data, images, documents and messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Designing and monitoring computer network systems for others; the design, development, and up-grading of computer software for others; the design, implementation and monitoring of computer network security systems for others; computer consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |