Drawing for MONSTER MILK

USPTO serial 76014883

MONSTER MILK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MULLEN, MARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER MILK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marc E. Miller, Amy Jones, Chester Jordan

MARC E MILLER Watkinson Miller1100 New Jersey Ave. SE, Suite 910WASHINGTON, DC 20003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Milk and milk products, namely colored and flavored milkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 14, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 5, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 5, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 23, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 21, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 16, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 17, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 30, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 21, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance