Drawing for E-HEALTHCARE BUSINESS ANSWERS.COM

USPTO serial 76015109

E-HEALTHCARE BUSINESS ANSWERS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with E-HEALTHCARE BUSINESS ANSWERS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith MM. Stolte,

KEITH MM STOLTE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STSTE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business consultation and business management services in the healthcare fields; providing information and consulting services in the fields of marketing, business and corporate strategy, efficiency evaluation, public and media relations, purchasing of products, equipment and services, all in the healthcare fields; business consultation and business management services provided to healthcare businesses, hospitals, clinics and medical offices relating to their business and marketing uses of global computer networks; business consultation and business management services directed to the business and marketing uses of technologies and global computer networks in the healthcare fields; and providing business information services in the field of medical facilities planning, construction, renovation, infrastructure, and managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance