Drawing for FULL FLAVOR REDS

USPTO serial 76015139

FULL FLAVOR REDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FULL FLAVOR REDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Stone Rosenfield

SUSAN STONE ROSENFIELD FENNEMORE CRAIG, PC3003 N CENTRAL AVE STE 2600PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2913UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031FRESH FRUITS AND VEGETABLES, NAMELY, TOMATOESACTIVEOct 29, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 19, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 13, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Sep 25, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 25, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance