Drawing for EONXCHANGE

USPTO serial 76015227

EONXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TINGLEY, JOHN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EONXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERRY J VISCOUNTY

PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1925UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035licensing of on-line company allocation and trading services whereby participants may submit orders to buy and sell a variety of emerging heterogeneous commodities and the prices are calculated through a mathematical algorithm that takes into account economic and market variablesACTIVE—
036providing an on-line company allocation and trading service accessible via a global computer network whereby participants may submit orders to buy and sell a variety of emerging heterogeneous commodities and the process are calculated through a mathematical algorithm that accounts for a large number of economic and market variablesACTIVE—
042product development for others, namely, developing web-based technologies that facilitate company allocation and trading in the emerging commodities from the environment, media and financial marketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 2, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 2, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance