USPTO serial 76015373
SYNCHRONIZED RELATIONSHIP MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2641217Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2002
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SYNCHRONIZED RELATIONSHIP MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terence P. O'Brien
TERENCE P O'BRIEN FOLEY & LARDNER330 N WABASH STE 3300CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consulting services in the field of developing interaction management and marketing for customer touch points and providing a synchronized way to orchestrate all customer interactions through systems and processes, comprised of customer relationship building programs, an integrated brand message and data analytics that are timed and balanced to work together for maximum impact and long-term profits, through nurturing interactive dialogue with customers, and developing predictive intelligence of customer desires; benchmarking and technology audits for others in the field of management and marketing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Design services, namely, valuation mapping, modeling of data, copy and graphics design for others; computer services, namely, creating automated robust analytics for others, namely, database analytics leading into and resulting from all customer and marketing interactions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Latham Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Walter Latham Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SYNCHRONIZED RELATIONSHIP MARKETING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |