USPTO serial 76015435
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
North Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN G. CHUPA
JOHN G CHUPA CHUPA & ALBERTI, PC31313 NORTHWESTERN HWYSTE 205FARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48334| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | battery-powered land vehicles, namely hybrid vehicles, electrical powered vehicles, all- terrain vehicles in the nature of bicycles, scooters, scooter bikes, services vehicles, dune buggies, go carts, race cars, camera cars, buses, trams, subway cars, and rail cars; battery-powered watercraft in the form of boats and jet skis; battery-powered aircraft in the form of airplanes, gliders, and helicopters; battery-powered farm equipment in the form of tractors, crop harvesters and tillers; battery-powered loading and unloading equipment in the form of fork lifts and lift trucks | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | battery-powered toys and sporting goods, namely, roller skates, roller blades, skateboards, and children's cars | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |