USPTO serial 76015524
FULFILLING YOUR SPIRITUAL HUNGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULFILLING YOUR SPIRITUAL HUNGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | CONSCIOUS LIVING (LIVING A CONSCIOUS LIFE); OVERCOMING SOFT ADDICTIONS-- FULFILLING YOUR SPIRITUAL HUNGER PROGRAM PUT ON BY THE SCHOOL OF EXCEPTIONAL LIVING AND JUDITH WRIGHT INCLUDES WEEKEND SEMINARS/RETREATS, BOOKS, WORKBOOKS, TAPES, BROCHURES, FLYERS, GROUP EDUCATIONAL TRAlNlNGS, CONSULTING AND COACHING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |