USPTO serial 76015559
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MIAMISBURG, OH
MIAMISBURG, OH
DAYTON, OH
Standard Register Company, The
Dayton, OH
Standard Register Company, The
Dayton, OH
STANDARD REGISTER COMPANY, THE
DAYTON, OH
NORTH MANKATO, MN
NORTH MANKATO, MN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer C. Debrow
Jennifer C. Debrow Taft Stettinius & Hollister LLP2200 IDS Center, 80 South 8th StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402-2210UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computer services in the field of documents and business forms, namely, computerized database management, data processing services; management and tracking of electronic files, advertising materials and promotional materials; distributorship services and computerized on-line ordering services in the fields of business forms, office supplies, computer supplies, maintenance supplies, repair supplies, advertising materials and promotional items; computerized tracking of documents and business forms orders; consulting services related to all of the foregoing; and business consultation in the fields of business forms, workflow management, workflow automation and electronic commerce | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | [electronic bill payment and bill presentment, namely, the electronic receipt of invoices for others] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | [document data transfer and physical conversion from one form of media to another] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | [computer services in the field of documents and business forms, namely, data recovery services;] database development services; providing databases and electronic libraries in the field of documents and business forms;[computer services, namely, providing on-line magazines in the field of electronic commerce;] providing on-line publications, namely, catalogs in the field of documents and business forms; up-dating of computer software; computer design of business forms and business forms systems, advertising and promotional materials, labels, identification labels and tags, identification cards, membership cards, access cards, control cards, business transaction cards for others; [computer systems analyses;] computer consultation services; computer programming for others; printing services; [and computer services, namely providing on-line bulletins, articles and newsletters in the fields of business forms and e-commerce] | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 17, 2024 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| May 17, 2024 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 16, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2020 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 28, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 24, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 22, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 20, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2004 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |