USPTO serial 76015620
TALKING SLEEVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TALKING SLEEVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY PERSONAL COMMUNICATION DEVICES FOR EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION, NAMELY PAGERS, TWO-WAY MESSAGING DEVICES, WIRELESS PHONES, SMART PHONES, INTERNET-ENABLED PHONES, HANDHELD COMPUTERS, PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS, AND MONITORS FOR COMMUNICATION, ENTERTAINMENT, EDUCATIONAL, AND SCIENTIFIC PURPOSES; APPARATUS OPERATE, INDEPENDENTLY, OR IN CONJUNCTION WITH SPECIALIZED APPAREL TO WHICH IT IS PHYSICALLY AND ELECTRONICALLY ATTACHED | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |