USPTO serial 76015661
MEMORY ALLIANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEMORY ALLIANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles S. Cotropia
CHARLES S COTROPIA SIDLEY & AUSTIN717 N HARWOOD, STE 3400DALLAS, TX 75201-6507UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services provided to patients with Alzheimer's and related disorders, namely, conducting classes, seminars, workshops and conferences in the field of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing medical evaluation and health care services to patients with Alzheimer's disease and related disorders; conducting medical and scientific research relating to Alzheimer's disease and related disorders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Baylor Health Care System
- Other trademarks owned by Baylor Health Care System
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MEMORY ALLIANCE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |