Drawing for MCLAREN

USPTO serial 76016018

MCLAREN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MCLAREN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Simonelli

CLARK HILL PLC500 WOODWARD AVE STE 3500DETROIT, MI 48226-3485UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land motor vehicle parts, namely, wheels; brakes; powertrains; electronic powertrain management systems comprised of electronic mass airflow sensors, programmable read-only memory chips, ignition controllers for spark ignition engines, fuel controllers for spark and compression ignition engines, controllers for cooling systemn, data acquisition and instrumentation for powertrain applications, controllers for vehicle traction and stability, and software therefor; body, chassis, suspension and steering components, namely torsion bars, sway bars, coil springs, leaf springs, struts, steering wheels, power steering pumps, gears and levers; and structual parts for the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 26, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 26, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 7, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 7, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Apr 8, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 25, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance