Drawing for FORMULA 101

USPTO serial 76016093

FORMULA 101

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ZAK, HENRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FORMULA 101?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

THOMAS F BERGEN WILLIAMS MULLEN8270 GREENSBORO DR STE 700MCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041LOTTERY SERVICES; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF COMPETITIONS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS, NAMELY, MOTOR RACING; OUTCOME PREDICTION GAMES FOR SPORTS; GAMING AND WAGERING IN THE FIELD OF MOTOR RACING; ORGANIZATION OF COMPETITIONS FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS; NONE OF THE SERVICES BEING CONNECTED WITH GOLF GAMESABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 31, 2003IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Jul 15, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION
May 28, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
May 28, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
Jan 13, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Sep 16, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 16, 2002REINREINSTATED
Apr 5, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance