Drawing for ONETRAVEL.COM

USPTO serial 76016399

ONETRAVEL.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, EUGENIA K
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONETRAVEL.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicole Peffer

NICOLE PEFFER HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP1000 LOUISIANA STE 4300HOUSTON, TX 77002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039Travel agency services, namely making reservations and bookings for transportation on an interactive web site, including providing and relaying information, and securing payment in connection with such bookings by electronic meansACTIVE—
042Making reservations and bookings for temporary lodging on an interactive web site, including providing and relaying information, and securing payment in connection with such bookings by electronic meansACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 29, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 30, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance