USPTO serial 76016405
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississauga, Ontario L4W 4W1, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emilia F. Cannella
EMILIA F CANNELLA BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR TEXT, VOICE, VIDEO AND DATA TRANSMISSION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, NAMELY, SOFTWARE FOR NETWORK SECURITY, NETWORK IDENTIFICATION PROTOCOL SERVERS, COMMUNICATION BANDWIDTH MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR GEOGRAPHIC POSITION IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS FOR COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONTROLLING TELECOMMUNICATIONS DEVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR MONITORING AND APPROVING ELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS OVER A TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING APPAREL, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TOPS, SOCKS, CAPS, HATS, VISORS, UNDERWEAR, SHORTS, PANTS, JACKETS, RAINCOATS, GOLF PANTS, SCARVES, GLOVES, PAJAMAS, BATHROBES, FOOTWEAR, BATHING SUITS, BELTS AND SUSPENDERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, CONSULTING AND DESIGN SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |