USPTO serial 76016496
GOURMET BUSINESS MAGAZINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YOUNG, CARRIE SKYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOURMET BUSINESS MAGAZINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan L. Jakel
JOAN L JAKEL VIRGO PUBLISHING, INCP O BOX 40079PHOENIX, AZ 85067-0079UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Trade magazine providing food and housewares related news, product information, trends, and retail business management information to the gourmet market, including gourmet and independent specialty food stores, natural health food stores, coffee and tea retailers, gourmet gift and cookware stores, supermarkets, independent grocers, mail order and internet gourmet retailers, gourmet distributors, brokers, wholesalers and manufacturers, gourmet specialty experts in the field and other related professionals | ACTIVE | Jul 6, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |