USPTO serial 76016727
PVDVD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PVDVD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Oberhardt
WILLIAM P OBERHARDT WILLIAM P OBERHARDT LLC2100 THREE 1ST NATIONAL PLZCHICAGO, IL 60602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio and video cassettes featuring music, movies, and filmed products for general entertainment; compact discs, video cassettes, digital video disks, digital versatile disks, CD-ROMS an DVD-ROMs containing music, movies, and filmed products for general entertainment; CD-ROMs and DVD-ROMs containing computer software for word processing, spreadsheets, data processing, data analysis, data manipulation, web browser, search engine, graphics display, graphic manipulation, video display, video manipulation, storage, organization, computer maintenance, computer programing, education, and entertainment for business, home, education, or developer | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store, mail order catalogue, phone order and computerized on line ordering services in the field of audio and video recordings and hardware, video game software and hardware, computer software and hardware and related electronic home products and equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |