USPTO serial 76017083
PANTRANET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PANTRANET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff
ROBERT W. SACOFF PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S. WACKER DRIVESUITE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in business management, project management and electronic commerce, namely, for use in spreadsheets, automated file management, contact management, correspondence management, enterprise database creation and management, and webpages, for use by Internet enabled enterprises | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Grolay Corporation Ltd The
- Other trademarks owned by PANTRANET INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PANTRANET INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named PANTRANET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |