USPTO serial 76017117
SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 2, 2003
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Chatsworth, CA
CHATSWORTH, CA
CHATSWORTH, CA
CHATSWORTH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY
ROBERTA JACOBS-MEADWAY Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC50 South 16th Street, 22nd FloorTwo Liberty PlacePhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products for men, women and children, namely hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair lotions, hair cremes, hair gels, hair sprays, hair color, hair dyes, hair rinses, hair mousse | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ecoly International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SEXY HAIR CONCEPTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2001 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |