USPTO serial 76017194
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH L KRAMM
THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLPSTE 1002099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR SMALL BUSINESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MODULES THAT PROVIDE VOICEMAIL, FAX, E-MAIL AND CONNECTION TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR SMALL BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | PROVIDING WARRANTY CONTRACTS FOR COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR SMALL BUSINESSES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MODULES TO PROVIDE VOICEMAIL, FAX, E-MAIL VIA CONNECTION TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK FOR SMALL BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HOSTING THE WEB MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY SITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVICE TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |