USPTO serial 76017842
PROSTACIDIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROSTACIDIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BELLEVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
BELLEVILLE, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Michael Bean
D. Michael Bean Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLPSuite 102050 Queen Street NorthKitchener, Ontario, N2H6M2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICALS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER OF THE PROSTATE; BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER OF THE PROSTATE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |