USPTO serial 76017963
ISOFTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISOFTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph T. Leone
JOSEPH T LEONE DEWITT ROSS & STEVENS, SC8000 EXCELSIOR DR 4TH FLMADISON, WI 53717-1914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | TELECOMMUNICATION BILLING, SALES VOLUME TRACKING, AND BILL SETTLEMENT SERVICES FOR TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES; COMPUTERIZED TRACKING AND TRACING OF PACKAGES IN TRANSIT | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 036 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS PRE-PAY AND POST-PAY CALLING CARD SERVICES | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATION DIAL-AROUND ACCESS SERVICES, INTERSTATE TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES; TELECOMMUNICATION TANDEM SWITCHING SERVICES, CELLULAR TELEPHONE SERVICES; TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION SERVICES; INTERNATIONAL CALL-BACK SERVICES; CELLULAR TELEPHONE VOICE MESSAGING SERVICES | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 042 | COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATION SERVICES FOR TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANIES; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR OTHER IN THE FIELD OF TELECOMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Apr 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Isoftel, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Isoftel, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Softel Telecommunications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ISOFTEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |