USPTO serial 76017991
RED BUFFALO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED BUFFALO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS P. ARDEN
THOMAS P ARDEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLC131 S DEARBORN ST STE 30CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Restaurant services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |