USPTO serial 76018076
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JODY H DRAKE
JODY H DRAKE SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and promotional services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed matter, preparing advertisements for others, placing advertisements for others, dissemination of advertising for others, direct mail advertising | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |