Drawing for B2B OR NOT TO BE?

USPTO serial 76018195

B2B OR NOT TO BE?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with B2B OR NOT TO BE??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew P. Bridges

ANDREW P BRIDGES WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATIPROFESSIONAL CORPORATION650 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1050

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for data management, and manuals therefor packaged as a unitACTIVEMar 8, 2000
039data management services provided via electronic communications networksACTIVEMar 8, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 30, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 7, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Mar 16, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 8, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance