USPTO serial 76018220
EDOMINUS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORA, ROGER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDOMINUS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Wadyka, Jr.
STEVEN J WADYKA JR GREENBERG TRAURIG1750 TYSONS BLVD 12TH FLMCLEAN, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and computer software to facilitate business-to- business and business-to-consumer electronic commerce; namely performing on-line ordering, inventory checking, inventory and order tracking, supply chain management and network security | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business and consulting services, namely, providing business-to-business and business-to-consumer electronic commerce services in the field of Internet commerce and information technology; inventory control, namely, on-line ordering, inventory checking, inventory and order tracking, supply chain management consulting | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing computer systems analysis and consultation services to allow business to establish business-to-business and business-to-consumer electronic commerce services for themselves and others; including on-line ordering, inventory checking, inventory and order tracking, supply chain management and network security; consulting about network security | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |