Drawing for FLEETLOGIX

USPTO serial 76018286

FLEETLOGIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with FLEETLOGIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Sebolt

JOSEPH A SEBOLT EET, NWSAND & SEBOLTAEGIS TWR STE 1100 4940 MUNSON STCANTON, OH 44718-3615

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039PROVIDING WEB SITE SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF MANAGING TRANSPORTATION SUPPLY CHAINS, NAMELY, FOR MANAGING, ROUTING, TRANSPORTING, RATING PAYMENT, SHIPMENT, LOAD BALANCING, TENDERING AND FREIGHT MANAGEMENT, LOAD AND UNLOAD SCHEDULING, DOCK SPACE SCHEDULING, FOR MANAGEMENT OF QUOTATION OF COST, FOR PROVIDING REQUESTS FOR QUOTES, SHIPPER AND CARRIER GRADING; FOR PROVIDING AUTOMATION BETWEEN SHIPPERS AND CARRIERS TO PROVIDE COLLABORATIVE WORKFLOW BETWEEN MULTIPLE SERVICE PROVIDERS; AND FOR ALLOWING AUTOMATION UPDATE OF ROUTING, GUIDELINES, TARIFFS AND CONTRACT DATA; AND FOR MANAGEMENT OF INTERNAL FLEET OPERATIONS, DISPATCH AND PAYMENT OF DRIVERS, MANAGEMENT OF FLEET ASSETS, NAMELY, TRACTORS AND TRAILERS, CONTROL OF FLEET EXPENSES, NAMELY, FUEL AND MAINTENANCE AND ELECTRONIC INTERFACES OF CUSTOMERS AND FOR PROVIDING REQUESTS FOR QUOTES AND REQUESTS FOR COSTS, ALL AVAILABLE OVER GLOBAL, LOCAL AND WIDE AREA NETWORKSABANDONED—
041TRAINING TO PERSONNEL FOR OPERATING COMPUTER SOFTWARE DIRECTED TO THE TRANSPORTATION AND SHIPPING INDUSTRYABANDONED—
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET, AND FOR WORD PROCESSING IN THE FIELD OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENTABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2003ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 12, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 12, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 29, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance