USPTO serial 76018289
VENDORLOGIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VENDORLOGIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH A SEBOLT
JOSEPH A SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLTASTON PARK PROFESSIONAL CTR STE 1944801 DRESSLER RD NWCANTON, OH 44718Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | providing web site services in the field of managing transportation supply chains, namely, for managing, routing, transporting, rating, payment, shipment, load balancing, tendering and freight management, load and unload scheduling, dock space scheduling, for management of quotation of cost, for providing requests for quotes, shipper and carrier grading; for providing automation between shippers and carriers to provide collaborative workflow between multiple service providers; for allowing automatic update of routing, guidelines, tariffs and contract data; and for managing relationships with vendors including for allowing vendors to individually and collectively respond to requests for quotes, and to assist in ordering, supplying, transporting, viewing and purchasing products and services; and for providing an electronic fulfillment and solution by traditional or collaborative methods, supply and replenishment and inventory management of products, all available over global, local and wide area networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | training to personnel for operating computer software directed to the transportation and shipping industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | providing temporary use of on-line software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, and for word processing in the field of transportation supply chain management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |