USPTO serial 76018334
DYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Collingwood, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L Worden
WILLIAM T WORDEN PIERCE ATWOODONE MONUMENT SQPORTLAND, ME 04101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, shirts, shorts, T-shirts, sweaters, pullovers, cardigans, sweatshirts, casual dress pants, loungewear, track pants, hats, night shirts, jerseys, jackets, rain jackets, year-round jackets, suits, dresses, blouses, underwear, lingerie, gloves, tank tops, kimonos, bathing suits, socks, robes, bandanas, headbands, belts, work pants, suits, ball caps, boots, shoes, sandals, vests; leather wear, namely, leather pants, shirts, dresses and jackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |