USPTO serial 76018341
ASIA TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATERS-PEREZ,KATHYRN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ASIA TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James W Dabney
JAMES W DABNEY PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, stationery, printed instructional and teaching materials regarding venture investment, internet business, corporate finance, technology development and business management; operating manuals, leaflets, catalogues, brochures, pamphlets and books regarding venture investment, internet business, corporate finance, technology development and business management | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business advice and consultation, business management, business organization, management assistance, business research, business planning consultation, business evaluations | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services in the field of computer hardware, software, networks and computer programming | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |