USPTO serial 76018506
NEA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING FROST & JACOBS LLP201 E FIFTH ST 2300 PNC CTRCINCINNATI, OH 45202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, T-shirts, sweaters, shirts, shorts, pants; footwear, namely, sporting shoes; headgear, namely, caps | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games and playthings, namely, video games and computer games; gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, surfboards, snow boards, skate boards, in-line skates, mountain bikes, windsurfing boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Arranging and conducting athletic competitions; entertainment services, namely sports competitions and providing television programming in the field of sports | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |