USPTO serial 76018675
Serial No. 76018675
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76018675?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. A. Burke
PAUL R A BURKE CORNING INCORPORATEDSULLIVAN PARK, SP-TI-3-1CORNING, NY 14831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Display glass for flat panel displays; glass substrates for information displays; liquid crystal display glass; flat glass used in Active Matrix Liquid Crystal Displays (AMLCD's) substrate glass for industrial applications;sheet glass; optical fiber; fiber optics; coaxial cable; composite cable; fiber optic cable; ribbon cable; loose tube cable; cable connectors; cable terminators; cable attenuators; mechanical splice connectors; optical fiber hardware; copper wire hardware; cable assemblies; splice and test instruments; optical amplifiers; getters; gratings; fiber brag gratings; fiber-optic components; condenser lens; active photonic devices; passive photonic devices; fiber optic sensors; crystal filters; optical modules for telecommunication applications; photo mask substrates for the manufacture of telecommunication and semiconductor devices; uv-glass; oscillators; spacecraft windows; and fiber optic couplers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |