Drawing for NAFRIL

USPTO serial 76019132

NAFRIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MOONEYHAM, JANICE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NAFRIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PAMELA B HUFF

PAMELA B HUFF COX & SMITH INCORPORATED112 E PECAN ST STE 1800SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Sodium fluoride compound for use in the treatment of osteoporosisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 20, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 13, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 6, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 28, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 9, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 8, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 1, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 11, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance