USPTO serial 76019173
STANDARDS IN ACTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STANDARDS IN ACTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID H. BERNSTEIN
DAVID H BERNSTEIN DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON919 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely a continuing live-action educational television and global computer network program, conducting interactive classes by means of a global computer network, and distributing course materials in connection with such program and classes via a global computer network, all in the fields of teacher training and implementation of learning standards for grades kindergarten-12 | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by EDUCATIONAL BROADCASTING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named STANDARDS IN ACTION
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 6, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |