Drawing for LABEL WAREHOUSE

USPTO serial 76019507

LABEL WAREHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with LABEL WAREHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT BERLINER

ROBERT BERLINER FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP865 S FIGUEROA ST 28TH FL STE 2900LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING MEN'S, WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, HOUSEWARES, AND HOUSEHOLD FURNISHINGSABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 23, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 23, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 23, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 8, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 6, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jun 6, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2001IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance