Drawing for PREMIER DINING

USPTO serial 76019703

PREMIER DINING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIER DINING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016BOOKS CONTAINING COUPONS AND CARDS WHICH ENTITLE THE HOLDER TO RECEIVE DISCOUNTS ON DINING; AND PRINTED DIRECTORIES OF BUSINESSES HONORING SUCH DISCOUNTSACTIVE—
035CONSUMER MEMBERSHIP SERVICES; NAMELY, PROVIDING INFORMATION AND ARRANGING FOR DISCOUNTS ON DINING; PROMOTING THE RESTAURANT SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF COUPON BOOKS, CARDS AND DIRECTORIES WHICH ENTITLE THE HOLDER TO RECEIVE DISCOUNTS ON DINING; AND BY PROVIDING VIA COMPUTER ON-LINE SERVICES A MEMBERSHIP PROGRAM ENTITLING THE PARTICIPANTS TO RECEIVE DISCOUNTS ON DINlNG; AND PROVIDING IN CONNECTION THEREWITH AN ON-LINE DIRECTORY OF INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROGRAM AND THE PARTICIPATING BUSINESSES,ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance