USPTO serial 76019719
COOPERATIVE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COOPERATIVE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANN K. FORD,
ANN K. FORD, PIPER RUDNICK LLP1200 19TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTATION SERVICES; PROVIDING CONSULTATION REGARDING THE MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, BANKING, INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, MORTGAGE LENDING AND COOPERATIVE BANKING SERVICES; ADMINISTRATION AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF EMPLOYEE BENEFITS AND HEALTH CARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by National Consumer Cooperative Bank
- Other trademarks owned by National Consumer Cooperative Bank
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named COOPERATIVE SOLUTIONS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |