Drawing for XMLFOUNDATIONS

USPTO serial 76019847

XMLFOUNDATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CROSS, TRACY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XMLFOUNDATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Keith M. Stolte

KEITH M STOLTE MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and computer hardware parts and accessories namely processors, interface units, memory drives, disk drives, electronic and circuitry boards, internal modems; keyboards, monitors, mouse devices; computer networks comprised of personal computers, servers, and mainframes; computer network equipment, namely connectors, adaptors, and lines; computer software for searching, retrieving, storing, organizing, displaying, indexing, manipulating and managing data and mining and warehousing information in the fields of science, physical sciences, life sciences, mathematics, chemistry, biochemistry, physics, environmental sciences, astrophysics, medicine, healthcare, computer science, engineering, agriculture economics, marketing, advertising, manufacturing, law, retail and wholesale sales, product inventory, management and logistics, transportation, investment and financing, news and topical information, travel, software and hardware development, database development and management, education, Internet and extranet management, web site design, development and hosting; e-commerce, decision support, bio-informatics, seismic analysis, biometrics, media assets and XML processes;computer software for data representation technology used for searching, retrieving, storing and managing data, hierarchical data structures and semi-structured and unstructured dataACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 21, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 24, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance