USPTO serial 76019984
FIRST ACTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FIRST ACTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Booterstown, County of Dublin, IE
Booterstown, County of Dublin, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul D. Greeley
PAUL D GREELEY OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLEONE LANDMARK SQ STE 903STAMFORD, CT 06901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FINANCIAL PLANNING, TRACKING INVESTMENTS, AND LOAN CALCULATION EXCLUDING FORECASTING SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS, FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF STOCKS, BONDS, AND MUTUAL FUNDS, FINANCIAL PLANNING, FINANCIAL PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL VALUATION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY AND REAL ESTATE, LOAN FINANCING, FINANCIAL GUARANTEE AND SURETY; INVESTMENT BROKERAGE SERVICES, BANKING, FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES, MORTGAGE, COMMERCIAL, AND CONSUMER LENDING SERVICES, GUARANTEE ASSURANCE UNDERWRITING, MORTGAGE, CAR, HOME EQUITY, AND PERSONAL LOANS, ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE PENSION PLANS; CREDIT BUREAUS, CREDIT CARD, CHARGE CARD, AND DEBIT CARD SERVICES; MONEY MARKET AND MONETARY EXCHANGE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |