USPTO serial 76020040
NIFTY 50
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NIFTY 50?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Galina A. Krasilovsky Kirman
GALINA A KRASILOVSKY KIRMAN WHITMAN BREED ABBOTT & MORGAN LLP200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | GREETING CARDS; Based on Intent to Use PAPER PARTY SUPPLIES, NAMELY, NAPKINS, TABLE COVERS, INVITATIONS, THANK YOU NOTES, HATS, PAPER PARTY BAGS, STREAMERS, BANNERS, JOINTED DECORATIONS, AND DOOR SIGNS; PARTY DECORATIONS; PAPER GIFT WRAP AND WRAPPING RIBBON; ENVELOPE AND STATIONERY PAPER SETS; CONFETTI; PLASTIC PARTY BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | PAPER PLATES; PAPER CUPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | PARTY FAVORS, NAMELY, NOISE-MAKING BLOW-OUTS AND PARTY HORNS; ADULTS' AND CHILDREN'S PARTY GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by English Cards Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by English Cards Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named NIFTY 50
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |