USPTO serial 76020219
U.S. SEARCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with U.S. SEARCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Falls Church, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford E. Kile
PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | employment consulting services to businesses and individuals in the field of employee screening, recruitment, referrals and placement and staffing; promotion and productivity decisions; job definition and development, motivational counseling; salary and benefit surveying and assisting in staff reorganizations; evaluating pre-employment applications and pre-employment surveys and providing hiring guidance to prospective employers; employment recruiting services, namely, identifying, screening and evaluating potential new candidates; building personality and character profiles for selected job positions, matching those profiles with a database of individual profiles previously generated, and providing market-based information regarding human resource policies; employment placement services, namely, scheduling and arranging interviews, interview assistance, and resume assistance and negotiate relocation issues, spousal issues and counteroffer issues; and management consulting services, namely, identify and locate merger and acquisition partners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 8, 2001 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |