USPTO serial 76020354
RTM 322
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RTM 322?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ruth L. Lansner
RUTH L LANSNER GILBERT, SEGALL AND YOUNG LLP430 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Internal combustion engines, including gas turbine engines for sea and air vehicles, stationary engines and power transmissions not for land vehicles and structured parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 20, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |