Drawing for GIVING VOICE TO THE NET

USPTO serial 76020443

GIVING VOICE TO THE NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIVING VOICE TO THE NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Celia G. Spiritos

CELIA G SPIRITOS BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYHOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of broadband telecommunications networks, broadband telecommunications equipment, software and hardware for others, all for use in the transmission of voice, facsimile, data, images and video, and for use in networkingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 17, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 8, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 30, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 13, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 23, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 12, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance