Drawing for ALADDIN'S EATERY

USPTO serial 76020517

ALADDIN'S EATERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAMMEL, LAURA A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALADDIN'S EATERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward T. Saadi, Esq.

Edward T. Saadi EDWARD T. SAADI, LLC970 Windham CourtSuite 7Boardman, OH 44512

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Small neighborhood storefront restaurants featuring Middle Eastern food specialtiesACTIVEApr 15, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 2, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 29, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 12, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 16, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 15, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 8, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 2, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 25, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 25, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 24, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 15, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 14, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jul 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 4, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 7, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 19, 2001ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance