Drawing for TIEBREAK

USPTO serial 76020532

TIEBREAK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIEBREAK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ilene B. Tannen

ILENE B TANNEN PENNIE & EDMONDS LLP1155 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025SPORTSWEAR FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, NAMELY VESTS, FLEECE VESTS, SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, TOPS, BLOUSES, SHORTS, PANTS, SKIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SWEATPANTS, WARM-UP SUITS, SWEATERS, JACKETS, HATS, CAPS, VISORS, SWEATBANDS, WRISTBANDS, SOCKS AND SHOESACTIVE—
032NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, ALOE VERA DRINKS AND JUICES, CIDER, CARBONATED AND NON-CARBONATED SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT JUICES, FRUIT DRINKS, FRUIT-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, FRUIT NECTARS, FRUIT PUNCH, LEMONADE, SPORTS DRINKS, TOMATO JUICE AND VEGETABLE JUICEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 29, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 18, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 28, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 6, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 16, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 6, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2000PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 13, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance