USPTO serial 76020597
OUTLAWZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OUTLAWZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley W. Sokoloff
STANLEY W SOKOLOFF BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jackets and hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |