USPTO serial 76020606
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
t
MARNIE WRIGHT BARNHORST ESQ THE TRADEMARK GROUP, APLC7850 IVANHOE AVELA JOLLA, CA 92037UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | educational services, namely, conducting individual counseling sessions, seminars and workshops which provide executives with information about business management | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 13, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |