USPTO serial 76020610
METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER HOME ENTERTAINMENT TRADEMARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- FILE RECEIVED AT REPOSITORY HOLDING AREA FOR FILING
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER HOME ENTERTAINMENT TRADEMARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MOTION PICTURE FILMS, PRE-RECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES AND VIDEO DISCS FEATURING ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, ACTION ADVENTURES, DRAMAS, COMEDIES, ROMANCES, SCIENCE FICTION, HORROR AND MYSTERIES | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 1997 |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES , NAMELY, PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OF THEATRICAL MOTION PICTURES AND FILM; AND PRODUCTION OF VIDEOCASSETTES, VIDEO DISCS, AUDIO TAPES, AND COMPACT DISCS | ACTIVE | Aug 21, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |